Aug 22 2007
Stop the insanity! Turn off the Internet! Think of the children!
Reading articles that extol the negative aspects of students and technology, the unbridled evil that is use without strict monitoring and filtering, brings my blood to the proverbial boil. This is another symptom of a society and educational system gone terribly awry, failing to teach individual responsibility for one’s actions while understanding the imperfect nature of the real world we live in.
“Schools are fighting a war,” says Robin Raskin, who, as founder of Raising Digital Kids, has been studying the effects of new media on society for the past 25 years. “Every school in the country is grappling with the same issues.” According to Will Richardson, author of Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms, we have seen the enemy, and it is us. Adults simply don’t know how to model appropriate digital behavior, he believes, so kids are making up the rules on their own. Is it a case of bad technology leading to bad behavior or good technology with not enough role models?
I’m with Will on this one. There’s no question in my mind the responsibility falls on the shoulders of the parents and teachers in educating students in the right and wrong ways to treat others using technology and in general. Often the expectation is the IT department will put in filters and firewalls to prevent students from going where they shouldn’t (no matter how hard they try) and if they do manage to transgress the Acceptable Use Policy will resolve every situation.
“Back in the day” if a student was caught paging through the National Geographic magazines looking for topless native women the reaction wasn’t, “Oh, we must protect the children! Get the scissors! Cut out the pages!” Or better yet…”This is our new library policy…if you are found to be in violation and viewing material deemed inappropriate you will be suspended, the offending material will be sealed and hidden, the librarian strictly disciplined, and we will alert the media!”
Why are we teaching kids the correct way to handle situations is to eliminate any possibility of them happening just because “they might?” Why not take away pencils and paper because “a student might write a nasty note [cheating test answers, obscene cartoon, bomb threat, insert your panic phrase of choice here]?” If we are expecting our students to leave school and remain as safe and insulated from every bad thing that could happen as they are in school (and don’t kid yourself…no matter how bad you think your school is, the real world is worse. Much, much worse.) we are doing them a disservice and need to let someone take our place.
Earlier this year, a teacher at Milwaukee’s Pulaski High School ducked out of the classroom for just a few moments and left her ninth-grade students unattended, at which point a scuffle broke out. Not long afterwards, 52 seconds of this “eyewitness” school news ended up on YouTube. Although no one was hurt, it was “a very serious issue,” says Ada Rivera, the school’s principal. But her school faces bigger problems than YouTube coverage. “Our issue is not pictures,” Rivera says. “Our issue is kids calling in parents, friends, and others to do physical harm to people in the building. That’s the real reason we have our cell phone policies.”
Why was this a “very serious issue?” Calling in others to do harm in the building? Don’t you have security policies about visitors on your campus? Why blame the phones for poor planning and administration?
So, for instance, a fight such as this one, caught on a cell phone and sent to a buddy outside the school, is likely to lead to further violence.
There is no way to say that this is “likely” to lead to further violence. Possibly yes, likely…your guess is as good as anyone else’s. Rather it leads to embarrassment to the school administration in far, far more cases than it contributes to the problem. If schools such as Virginia Tech can put policies in place to leverage cell phones to protect their students, where’s the rationale for banning them?
Technology is only the tool for bad behavior, and teachers have been teaching right from wrong since the days of Plato. Educators are also brilliant at holding children accountable—more so, at times, than parents are. To Richardson’s eye, it’s time to go back to the drawing board and stop thinking about policies that limit technology, and instead focus on what we do best. “It has to be a K–12 curriculum in which we model good behavior,” Richardson argues. “We have to be consistent in our own behavior, and hand out real consequences for abuses to the procedures.”
Stop blaming technology for the failings of people. Spend your time teaching students how to be good people by lesson and by example. Stop teaching them others will protect them from bad decisions and poor choices. Start teaching them (again, since we used to do this) if they do something irresponsible or stupid (yes, I said it) they have to take responsibility for it, not that they should have been prevented from making the mistake in the first place so it’s not their fault.
At some point in the future the following will “likely” be heard in a courtroom:
Judge: “Why did you commit that crime?”
Defendant: “Because nobody stopped me.”
Judge: “Didn’t you know what you were doing was wrong?”
Defendant: “If it was wrong, I wouldn’t have been able to do it in the first place. That’s the way it was in school.”
Stop the insanity. Stop worrying about the technology. Do right by the kids. Teach them how to live in school and after.
One of the toughest aspects of any system for personal management is sticking with it. I don’t care what magical solution is being pitched this week, if you don’t do it consistently then it’s nothing more than another time-sucking task. So how do you keep your butt on the wagon and make progress?
Far too much of the focus in the edtech space is placed on the tool with the biggest hype at the time. Twitter, tumblr, blogger, wiki, whatever’s getting the hype is the one that we’re trying to figure out how to teach our students to use to better their educational experience.