Dangerously Irrelevant: Right of refusal
Scott McLeod voices this observation:
“…can anyone else think of an employment sector other than K-12 and postsecondary education where employees have the right to refuse to use technology?
For example, a grocery store checker doesn’t get to say ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use a register.’ A stockbroker doesn’t get to say, ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use a computer.’ An architect doesn’t get to say, ‘No thanks, I don’t think I’ll use AutoCAD.’ But in education, we plead and implore and incentivize but we never seem to require.
In many industries, knowledge of relevant technologies is a necessary prerequisite for either getting or keeping one’s job. Sometimes the organization provides training; sometimes the employee is expected to get it on her own. Either way, the expectation is that use of the relevant technologies is a core condition of employment.”
While I don’t agree that every industry outside of education can mandate computer use effectively (try working in manufacturing administration for a while and you’ll see) I do agree with the point teachers have an exceptionally high level of autonomy when it comes to life within their classroom. Granted, their curriculum may be mandated, tests dictated, and results measured but their delivery is commonly left up to them.
There has always been a strength to providing teachers the adaptability to react to their students’ individual needs and requirements in learning. That flexibility and opportunity to innovate helps good teachers take advantage of all the tools at their disposal to assist the young minds to grow and flourish. Yes, you saw correctly, I said “good teachers”. Any teacher not continually striving to improve their ways of delivering lessons, reaching out to students, drawing them in and setting them free to explore and learn in my book is not doing their best for their audience.
If we as educators are not willing to step up to the plate and challenge the status quo what kind of example are we setting for our students? Do you want them to learn to accept what they’re given, stay comfortably within the box, and not rock the boat? Would you rather have students that break the mold, innovate, explore, and journey to intellectual places you never imagined? Learn for their sake, not yours. Lead by example. Stand at the front of the boat, look out for the rocks, but let them paddle and propel you both to new and wonderful places.
The comedian Bill Engvall does a routine about how people who say stupid things should wear a sign so they can be easily identified. The next time a teacher says to you, “Oh, I don’t need to use this in my classroom. My students do just fine the way I do things now. I don’t have the time to learn this new stuff” reply to them…”Here’s your sign.”